ARTDESENT — Art, Design, Entertainment

Documenting the Legacy of Women Photographers: A New Volume Challenges the Canon

A newly released book spotlights two centuries of women photographers, positioning their work as both a historical record and a call for equity in the present.

By Inês Vasconcelos··3 min read
woman in orange shirt holding black dslr camera
· Brooke Cagle (Unsplash License)

The matte cover of What She Saw: Women Photographers Upending the Frame features a striking photograph by Claudia Andujar. This 1974 image captures the urgency of amplifying historically excluded perspectives. Published in October 2023 by Thames & Hudson, the book spans two centuries and showcases over 120 women photographers. From Anna Atkins’s delicate cyanotypes of algae in 1843 to Zanele Muholi’s powerful self-portraits, the collection defies a linear narrative. Co-editor Roxana Marcoci of The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) states that the book aims to “disrupt the idea of progress” in art history by presenting photography as a medium enriched by diverse voices. The 336-page volume organizes its content thematically. Sections like "Seeing and Being Seen" and "The Body Politic" help readers understand how women photographers have navigated and reshaped their worlds. One notable inclusion is Homai Vyarawalla, India’s first woman photojournalist. A 1947 photograph captures Jawaharlal Nehru raising the Indian national flag; Vyarawalla frames the scene to emphasize the collective gaze of the crowd. Co-editor Amanda Maddox, formerly of the Getty Museum, emphasizes that the book interrogates structures marginalizing women in photographic history. It includes works by lesser-known artists like Tsuneko Sasamoto, one of Japan’s first female photojournalists, alongside icons like Dorothea Lange and Cindy Sherman. What She Saw highlights how institutional bias and societal constraints have shaped the photographic landscape. The book explores how women photographers engage with gender as a subject. A spread on Claude Cahun and Marcel Moore features archival prints from the 1920s, where the duo used surrealist techniques to challenge gender norms. Their photographs resonate with contemporary artists like Lorna Simpson. Maddox writes that the volume seeks to “build a bridge across decades,” connecting the challenges faced by Atkins or Cahun to those of Simone Niamah or Stephanie Syjuco today. Compiling What She Saw was an act of restoration. According to Marcoci, the editors spent over four years consulting archives, private collectors, and photographers’ estates. Some images were drawn from collections that had not been digitized or publicly exhibited for decades. The editors describe the result as both a celebration and an intervention, foregrounding voices relegated to footnotes in photographic history. The book contributes significantly to discussions about gender equity in the arts. While institutions like MoMA and Tate Modern have made strides in recognizing women photographers, these efforts often lack depth. What She Saw advocates for a more comprehensive approach, acknowledging both accomplishments and barriers. At the book’s launch event in New York, artist Wendy Red Star remarked on its potential as a resource for younger generations. “When I was starting out, there wasn’t one place where I could see myself represented in the history of photography,” she said. “This book changes that—not just for Indigenous women, but for anyone who has been told their perspective doesn’t belong.” The book’s design reflects its educational intent. Each photograph includes detailed captions with dates, medium, and the photographer’s words when possible. A timeline situates key works within broader historical contexts like suffrage movements and civil rights struggles, highlighting gaps in acquisition practices. What She Saw is not without its critics. Some have pointed out that it pays limited attention to intersections of race, class, and geography. While it features photographers beyond the Euro-American sphere, the editors acknowledge that the book is a starting point. “The history we tell here is incomplete,” Marcoci admits. “It will always be incomplete, because history itself is an act of reconstruction.” This incompleteness, however, may be the book’s greatest strength. By avoiding a single narrative, it fosters dialogue and further inquiry. As Maddox notes, the book serves as both a record of the past and an invitation to envision what could be. The photographs, like Andujar’s threads of light on the cover, remind us that visibility is an act of persistence.

#photography#women artists#gender equity#art history#photographic archives
Inês VasconcelosInês Vasconcelos writes on photographers, photobooks and exhibition photography from Lisbon. Co-edits a small biannual journal on Iberian image-makers.
Continue reading