ARTDESENT — Art, Design, Entertainment

Preserving Past and Present: Architectural Heritage in Urban Design

From Istanbul's Muammer Karaca Theatre to Bangkok's Dondoh restaurant, projects blending preservation with innovation redefine how cities engage with their architectural past.

By Clara Hoffmann··3 min read
the ceiling of a large building with columns and windows
· Joshua Jumarie (Unsplash License)

In 2021, the Muammer Karaca Theatre reopened in Istanbul, refurbished by Tabanlıoğlu Architects to honor its 1960s origins while appealing to a 21st-century audience. Commissioned by the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, the project avoided retro pastiche and resisted the tabula rasa tendencies of urban redevelopment. The theatre now features a flexible, 302-seat auditorium adorned with warm wood accents that reflect the mid-century modern ethos of its original architect, Muammer Karaca. This blend of modern function and architectural homage illustrates the balance needed to preserve cultural identity within urban landscapes.

Half a continent away, the Dondoh restaurant in Bangkok offers a compelling case of architectural heritage engaging with contemporary needs. Designed by Space+Craft in 2022, this Japanese robatayaki eatery occupies a repurposed teak building from the early 20th century. The structure serves not just as a shell but as a participant in the dining atmosphere: its weathered wood beams were restored, while new steel elements introduced a subtle modern contrast. This design becomes archaeological, layering times and textures that invite patrons to connect with Bangkok’s rich urban history.

These projects are shaped by public and institutional frameworks that aim to combat the homogenization threatening cities globally. The jury for the 2021 European Prize for Urban Public Space, chaired by Francesc Muñoz, highlighted the risk of urban revitalization projects erasing local specificity in favor of global design trends. Yet, as these examples show, when executed with precision and respect, renewal can amplify cultural heritage rather than dilute it.

The economics of adaptive reuse play a central role in these discussions. In Istanbul, the Muammer Karaca Theatre’s funding came from municipal budgets and cultural grants, emphasizing a commitment to cultural continuity over transient commercial gain. In Bangkok, private investment drove the Dondoh project, supported by Thailand’s Fine Arts Department, which provided guidance on teak conservation standards. Both cases illustrate that successful architectural heritage projects often rely on collaboration between public institutions and the private sector, avoiding the extremes of either approach.

Challenges remain, including the expectation that such projects must integrate sustainability metrics. At the Muammer Karaca Theatre, Tabanlıoğlu Architects incorporated energy-efficient lighting and HVAC systems, aligning with Istanbul's climate goals under the C40 Cities initiative. Similarly, Space+Craft’s interventions in the Dondoh restaurant preserved more than just teak; they significantly reduced embodied carbon by minimizing new material use. These steps indicate a convergence of architectural heritage and environmental stewardship, though the integration of these priorities varies globally.

Public perception complicates matters. Bold interventions in historical sites often provoke polarized reactions, especially in cities with complex histories. Initially, the Muammer Karaca Theatre’s refurbishment faced criticism for its modernist interiors within a beloved landmark. However, public reception shifted as the space re-established itself as a vital cultural hub. This trajectory reflects a broader pattern noted by scholars like William Logan, who emphasizes 'living heritage'—sites actively used and adapted rather than frozen in time.

These projects demonstrate that architectural heritage cannot be mere nostalgia. Professor Ebru Erbas Gurler of Istanbul Technical University argues, “the most successful urban preservation projects treat history as a dynamic force rather than a static backdrop.” This principle is evident in individual projects and broader urban planning. Istanbul’s inclusion of adaptive reuse strategies in its Urban Conservation Plan (2022–2030) signals a long-term commitment to such approaches.

The unresolved question is scalability. Can the principles demonstrated at the Muammer Karaca Theatre or Dondoh be replicated across cities of varying scales, economies, and historical contexts? Urban theorists like Muñoz warn that the increasing privatization of public spaces impedes cultural preservation, as market forces often prioritize short-term profit. Yet, effective collaboration between municipal authorities and design practitioners—as seen in Istanbul’s public-private funding model—suggests that even commercially dense urban settings can maintain their cultural identities.

Moving forward, the challenge will be to integrate this ethos not just in flagship projects but across the urban fabric. As global cities expand and densify, the pressure to balance history and modernity will intensify. Whether this balance becomes a standard practice or remains exceptional is still uncertain. Projects like the Muammer Karaca Theatre and the Dondoh restaurant provide a blueprint that marries historical preservation with contemporary relevance, proving that architecture can serve both time and place without compromising either.

#architectural heritage#urban design#cultural identity#historical preservation#adaptive reuse#sustainability
Sources
Clara Hoffmann — Clara Hoffmann covers architecture and contested urbanism from Berlin. Former editor at Bauwelt; trained at the TU Berlin.
Continue reading